The Authors Guild, John Grisham, George R.R. Martin, Michael Connelly, Jodi Picoult and a group of other famous fiction writers filed a class action lawsuit on Wednesday against OpenAI, claiming that their technology is infringing on their works.
It’s the latest lawsuit to challenge AI’s use of copyrighted works as “training data” for their system.
In their complaint, the authors claim that OpenAI copied their works “wholesale, without permission or consideration.” The plaintiffs contend that the company fed their works into large language models, “algorithms designed to output human-seeming text responses to users’ prompts and queries.”
Related Stories
“Generative AI is a vast new field for Silicon Valley’s longstanding exploitation of content providers. Authors should have the right to decide when their works are used to ‘train’ AI. If they choose to opt in, they should be appropriately compensated,” author Jonathan Franzen said in a statement. Read the complaint.
Watch on Deadline
Other author plaintiffs in the case include David Baldacci, Mary Bly, Sylvia Day, Elin Hilderbrand, Christina Baker Kline, Maya Shanbhag Lang, Victor LaValle, Douglas Preston, Roxana Robinson, George Saunders, Scott Turow, and Rachel Vail.
According to the suit, when prompted OpenAI’s ChatGPT “accurately generated summaries” of works Grisham’s The Chamber, The Client and The Firm, as well as an unauthorized and detailed outline of the next installment of The King of Torts. The latter included a title, The Kingdom of Consequences, that used the same characters from the existing book. ChatGPT did the same for The Last Juror, and also generated an accurate summary of Grisham’s The Litigators, according to the lawsuit. ChatGPT “could not have generated the material” had it “not ingested and been ‘trained'” on Grisham’s works, the lawsuit stated.
The lawsuit seeks class certification, an injunction prohibiting their works from being used in the large language models without authorization, unspecified actual damages and, in the alternative, statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work.
A spokesperson for OpenAI said via email, “Creative professionals around the world use ChatGPT as a part of their creative process. We respect the rights of writers and authors, and believe they should benefit from AI technology. We’re having productive conversations with many creators around the world, including the Authors Guild, and have been working cooperatively to understand and discuss their concerns about AI. We’re optimistic we will continue to find mutually beneficial ways to work together to help people utilize new technology in a rich content ecosystem.”
The litigation is only the latest filed by content creators over AI. In July, Sarah Silverman and two other authors sued OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement. Barry Diller has said that he’s also organizing publishers for a class action lawsuit.
In a statement, Terrence Hart, general counsel of the Association of American Publishers, said of the latest litigation, “We agree that unauthorized use of literary works by AI developers presents serious questions of law that cannot simply be dismissed with assertions that the technology is ‘innovative.’ Innovative for whom? At what cost? Under what rules? We will follow the lawsuit closely.”
I don’t see how AI companies can win this when it’s a known fact that they literally fed their models a dataset of 200K pirated copyrighted novels.
Another bullshit lawsuit that has no merit
Martin has been on strike for the last 10 years if he wasn’t WINDS OF WINTER would have been finished
Morons who have no understanding of how AI works want to ban the technology. If they think they should get paid for the AI reading their book during training, then they’re saying anyone who reads a book and then writes a summary or a new book is “stealing”. By their own idiotic logic, every author should be required to pay $150k per book they read in their life because that trained them on how to write stories.
Copyright law can be confusing if you have never studied it.
But there is a reason why YouTube creators and podcasters can only use copyrighted material in certain ways.
When a person summarizes or reviews a book, it’s done by a person and is not reusing anything that anyone has written or said (if they did, it would be illegal)
When you do use a certain amount of content in a paper, you have to cite it. Because this is not information that you discovered on your own, or wrote yourself.
ChatGPT is creating a summary of material that it has not been given permission to use.
False equivalency. If I read a book and write a summary I am not using that summary to generate revenue. OpenAI is using all of this COPYRIGHTED material to create its own business and yes, create a business worth billions of dollars. It would be like me stealing the electricity and water from your house to run MY business. It’s ethically wrong.
“Generative AI is a vast new field for Silicon Valley’s longstanding exploitation of content providers. Authors should have the right to decide when their works are used to ‘train’ AI”
No actually, they should have no right to training/learning for AI.
They only can stand on copyright.