Matt Schrader on X: "Despite his consistent brilliance, @adam_tooze's newness to the security debate on China shows here. An East Asian security order large enough to accommodate China's rise isn't just a non starter in DC, but in Tokyo, Canberra, and Dehli too.
https://t.co/LqwfeY0vLE"
Despite his consistent brilliance, @adam_tooze's newness to the security debate on China shows here. An East Asian security order large enough to accommodate China's rise isn't just a non starter in DC, but in Tokyo, Canberra, and Dehli too.
Despite his consistent brilliance, @adam_tooze's newness to the security debate on China shows here. An East Asian security order large enough to accommodate China's rise isn't just a non starter in DC, but in Tokyo, Canberra, and Dehli too.
Viewed from Europe I'm sure this whole thing can look like it's all US driven, but many countries in Asia have been souring on China for a decade now. The US is not forcing Japan, Australia, or The Philippines to change their security stance vis a vis China.
Hey Matt Im perfectly aware of everything you say here. But the choices that the regional actors make are not independent of the options offered to them by Washington. Something that 1920s teaches important lessons about.