âŠwhat ânew security orderâ means is left tantalisingly undefined, but at the very least such an order (acceptable to China) would mean acquiescing to Beijingâs large territorial claims in the region, which wld be antithetical to stability and against the wishes of the smaller states.
Canât agree with this: âIn the longer term, a reduction in tension requires something more fundamentalâa new security order for east Asia based on the accommodation of Chinaâs historic rise.â Washington isnât listening to business on China any more @FT on.ft.com/3LBSR5X- âŠwhat ânew security orderâ means is left tantalisingly undefined, but at the very least such an order (acceptable to China) would mean acquiescing to Beijingâs large territorial claims in the region, which wld be antithetical to stability and against the wishes of the smaller states.