The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20140619224231/http://www.academia.edu:80/Documents/in/Textual_Criticism
Notes on the peculiar textual tradition of the 'Dotzè del Crestià' (1385) of Francesc Eiximenis OFM.
"CALL FOR BOOK CHAPTERS: "MAPPING THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA IN TURKEY" Editors: Barış Çoban & Bora Ataman Extended Deadline for abstracts: January 1st 2013 http://alternativemediamap.net/ We aim to map the alternative media in... more
"CALL FOR BOOK CHAPTERS: "MAPPING THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA IN TURKEY"

Editors: Barış Çoban & Bora Ataman

Extended Deadline for abstracts:
January 1st 2013

http://alternativemediamap.net/

We aim to map the alternative media in Turkey, which is varied in form, structure and working styles such as “cracks”, “rhizomes” and “fronts”. Similarly to what has occurred with the mainstream media, both large and small examples of the alternative media, alongside their widespread prevalence inside the country, have also already transcended the national borders. We argue that mapping the alternative media, embracing newspapers, radio and television channels, cinemas, blogs, forums and platforms, essentially the full range of conventional and new media organs and vehicles, is one of the most useful research approaches to comprehending the nature of alternative politics in Turkey.

The alternative media works as a source of memory and an archive helping to understand the historical and current structure of alternative politics in Turkey. IT also gives voice to alternative ideologies and politics and makes their political activities visible. In addition, the alternative media, which mainly represents the “otherised”, oppressed and marginalised groups, forms the vanguard of struggle against the hegemony and barbarism of the oppressive, globalized neo-liberal society.

Alternative media, as an umbrella term, applies to those media organs which are typically bottom up organisations. In principle, their organizational structures and decision making processes are democratic, participatory, polyphonic and dialogic. Their opposition to the mainstream media finds its roots, in its form and content, in social and political struggles and is based in radical ideologies such as anarchism, radical democracy and Marxism. The existence of alternative media indicates the struggle to construct a truly democratic and free sphere of communication from a number of broad perspectives, varying from the idea of simply being independent from either the state or capital, to being completely opposed to them. In this context, it is also possible to claim that every organ of the alternative media, as a centre of subaltern resistance, is part of a greater alternative communication network.

This so-called alternative network (or networks) is/are the voice of different political or social groups, communities, minorities or even individuals at the grassroots level. Thus, they open the way for these groups to actively participate in political and social life, as either real “agents” or as “spectacles” in the field of symbolic struggle. Therefore, individuals or groups can find opportunities to get involved in both real and symbolic struggles for hegemony, not only as consumers, but also as producers; as active agents.

Therefore, alternative media institutions either on the micro- or macro-scale cannot be considered as combatants solely at the informational level. In addition to their struggle to gather, record and spread news and ideas concerning local, national and transnational problems, they also provide a response to the establishment through real political actions. It is not unusual to see their active participation in protests, or even note that they hold the leadership positions in the organisation of some of these dissident political actions. Therefore, their active struggle with the hegemonic powers can also be considered as an effort to create alternative political forms. More commonly however, alternative media operate as the symbolic production centre of alternative politics and as an incubation ground for the intellectual and ideological constructs of social movements.

Alternative media, along with other dissident institutions, are seen as paving the way for a brighter and more just future by being the voice of the voiceless and contributing to the imagining of a different world. Threatening so-called representative democracy by supporting participatory social, cultural and political activities is also deemed useful to this end. By engaging in such activities, they may be able to cause the transformation of political culture in general. More importantly, however, the ways in which subordinate constituents of the society interpret politics and their own means of participation could change in a positive manner. Moreover, such efforts may also lead to the construction of efficient counter-public spheres alongside the more common examples of alternative spaces.
Diverse anti-systemic, reformist and revolutionary ideological orientations, varied political discourses and different modes of action constituting the alternative media landscape mostly open up an opportunity for the “oppressed” to actively participate in these alternative political spaces that are, to a certain extent, diverse, colourful, vivid and, most importantly, innately dialogic.
In this context, we argue that the “duty” of academia should be to understand these alternatives without stigmatizing them as the source of conflicts within the prevailing social system. After all, we as editors, would like to study these initiatives since the imagining of an alternative world may only be possible by embracing the oppressed and their voice, even though the world around us is not particularly welcoming.

Abstracts of papers are sought on topics such as:
• Radical- militant media (affiliated with revolutionary organizations)
• Radical media (Struggling within legal parameters to push the limits of the existing system
• Identity and rights-based media (Human rights, labour and trade-union rights, gender, environment, ethnicity, struggles based on faith or denomination
• Transnational and diaspora-based alternative media
• Independent, objective, opposition media
• Dissident voices, “cracks” in the mainstream media

However, it should be noted that the categories above do not refer to independent categories with clear differences. It is possible to say that; most examples of the alternative media operating in Turkey can be included under more than one of the rubrics mentioned above. Nevertheless, the alternative media organs in Turkey, despite a degree of permeability in the boundaries that separate them, may be seen as belonging more to one or another of the above-mentioned classifications, therefore, these categories will constitute the book’s chapters.

Furthermore, we are mainly interested in the case studies (comparative if possible) and empirical research possessing theoretical and methodological clarity, and focusing on at least one of three basic dimensions of media studies; such as “Production”, “Text”, or “Audience”, without missing the multi-layered and intertwined relationships between these dimensions.

Abstracts of a maximum of 250 words in Turkish and English outlining the topic, theoretical and methodological approach as well as the research question, should be submitted to either Barış Çoban (bcoban@dogus.edu.tr) or Bora Ataman (bataman@dogus.edu.tr) until January1st 2013.

Announcement of the abstracts selected will be made by February 1 2013.

The deadline for full paper submissions is August 1, 2013

The editors are planning to publish book in Turkish and English and have made an agreement with Yordam, to publish in January 2014.

After the evaluation of the abstracts, negotiations with foreign publishing houses will begin for the English version.
Barış Çoban & Bora Ataman (Eds.)
Extended Deadline for Research Proposals: January 1st, 2013"
Research Interests:
Creative Writing, Screenwriting, Critical Theory, Critical Theory, Critical Theory, and 418 moreedit
Add File
S různorodým dílem francouzského sémiologa, literárního teoretika i kritika Rolanda Barthese má český čtenář relativně bohatou zkušenost. Barthes je jedním z nejpřekládanějších francouzských teoretiků té doby a jeho dílo se často stává... more
S různorodým dílem francouzského sémiologa, literárního teoretika i kritika Rolanda Barthese má český čtenář relativně bohatou zkušenost. Barthes je jedním z nejpřekládanějších francouzských teoretiků té doby a jeho dílo se často stává předmětem úvah českých odborníků na literaturu. Někdy se dokonce zdá, že jen on sám stojí za myšlenkově bohatým dědictvím francouzského literárněvědného strukturalismu a jeho dílo je chápáno jako určitá synekdocha vývoje tohoto dodnes vlivného hnutí. Jednotlivé etapy Barthesova myšlenkového vývoje se dokonce v některých monografiích stávají modelem pro periodizaci dějin vývoje francouzské literární teorie.
Add File
Add File
Add File
Add File
This paper presents, somewhat polemically, the view that textual scholars need to immerse themselves in the digital world, and take full responsibility themselves for the digital editions they make. This requires a rethinking of the... more
This paper presents, somewhat polemically, the view that textual scholars need to immerse themselves in the digital world, and take full responsibility themselves for the digital editions they make.  This requires a rethinking of the model of collaboration between textual scholar and digital humanist which has reigned for twenty years: what  the paper calls the 'one scholar/one project/one digital humanist' model.  The paper should be read with a companion blog, at http://scholarlydigitaleditions.blogspot.com/2013/07/why-digital-humanists-should-get-out-of.html, which elaborates an alternative model  for collaboration between textual scholars and digital humanists (basically: many scholars/many projects/many digital humanists), and advocates too the widespread adoption of Creative Commons attribution share-alike licences (without the toxic 'non-commercial' restriction) for edition materials, and for their availability through open APIs, independent of any one interface. Joris van Zundert's blog at http://brandaen.huygensinstituut.nl/?p=497 (note his comment on his own blog) also contains arguments which should be read alongside this paper.
Add File
Add File
"This contribution deals with a textual problem in the greek tradition of Galen's Commentaria in Hìppocratis Epidemiarum librum VI (304, 13-306, 19 Wenkebach-Pfaff). With the support of the arabic translation of IXth century by Hunain... more
"This contribution deals with a textual problem in the greek tradition of Galen's Commentaria in
Hìppocratis Epidemiarum librum VI (304, 13-306, 19 Wenkebach-Pfaff). With the support of the arabic translation
of IXth century by Hunain ibn Ishaq, and considering Galen's usus scrìbendi, the author tries to reconstruct a better
text, supposing the existence of a lacuna in the greek textual tradition of the Marcianus Venetus 283 manuscript,
together with a significant interpolation due to an error made by the copyist. "
Add File
Add File

Log In

or
or reset password

Need an account? Click here to sign up

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

Academia © 2014