The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20140626120851/http://www.academia.edu:80/Documents/in/Insubordination
Add File
"Esta tesis aborda dos problemas interrelacionados en el anΓ‘lisis de las estructuras gramaticales en situaciones de interacciΓ³n: (i) el reto teΓ³rico-metodolΓ³gico de integrar informaciones de distintos niveles lingΓΌΓ­sticos (entonativos,... more
"Esta tesis aborda dos problemas interrelacionados en el anΓ‘lisis de las estructuras gramaticales en situaciones de interacciΓ³n: (i) el reto teΓ³rico-metodolΓ³gico de integrar informaciones de distintos niveles lingΓΌΓ­sticos (entonativos, morfosintΓ‘cticos y semΓ‘ntico-pragmΓ‘ticos) en el anΓ‘lisis de las estructuras y (ii) el reconocimiento de estructuras y categorΓ­as desatendidas en la tradiciΓ³n gramatical.

En la primera parte, de carΓ‘cter teΓ³rico, se discute la conveniencia de adoptar un modelo construccional para el anΓ‘lisis de la gramΓ‘tica en interacciΓ³n. Para ello, se revisa crΓ­ticamente el conjunto de acercamientos a la gramΓ‘tica que conforman la GramΓ‘tica de Construcciones y se propone un nuevo modelo: la GramΓ‘tica de Construcciones en InteracciΓ³n. Se trata de un modelo de representaciΓ³n gramatical basado en construcciones sensible a informaciΓ³n de tipo interaccional (unidades conversacionales, actividades interaccionales, participantes en la interacciΓ³n, principalmente).

En la segunda parte, se aplica el modelo teΓ³rico propuesto al anΓ‘lisis de un fenΓ³meno del espaΓ±ol habitualmente desatendido en las descripciones gramaticales de esta lengua: el empleo de marcas de subordinaciΓ³n en estructuras sintΓ‘cticamente independientes. Por una parte, se sistematiza la informaciΓ³n disponible acerca de estas estructuras en la bibliografΓ­a hispΓ‘nica y se pone en relaciΓ³n con otras propuestas disponibles en la lingΓΌΓ­stica general. Por otra, se propone un anΓ‘lisis basado en corpus que aplica el modelo de anΓ‘lisis propuesto en la primera parte.

La GramΓ‘tica de Construcciones en InteracciΓ³n permite analizar de forma coherente y exhaustiva los rasgos formales e interpretativos de un grupo de estructuras caracterΓ­sticas del espaΓ±ol oral espontΓ‘neo, al tiempo que permite ubicar estas estructuras en el conjunto de construcciones que constituye la gramΓ‘tica del espaΓ±ol y explicar su valor comunicativo en situaciones de interacciΓ³n oral.

This dissertation addresses two interrelated problems in the analysis of grammatical structures in interaction: (i) the theoretical and methodological challenge of integrating features that belong to different linguistic levels (intonation, morphosyntax and meaning-function) in the analysis of structures and ( ii) the recognition of structures and categories neglected in descriptive grammars.

In the first part, adopting a theoretical point of view, I discuss the adequacy of a constructional approach to grammar in order to analyze the grammatical constructions in interaction. To achieve this, I critically review different versions of Construction Grammar, and I propose a new version: Interactional Construction Grammar. Interactional Construction Grammar is a construction-based approach to grammar that incorporates interactional information (units conversational interactional activities, participants in interaction, among other features).

In the second part, the model is applied to an often overlooked phenomenon in Spanish: the use of subordination marks in independent structures. First, I systemize information available about these structures in Spanish literature. Secondly, I relate it to other proposals available in general linguistics. Finally, I propose a corpus-based analysis that applies the model proposed in the first part.

Interactional Construction Grammar allows a coherent and comprehensive analysis of the form and meaning of insubordinated structures. At the same time, the model allows the analyst to place these structures in Spanish grammar as a whole and describes its meaning in terms of interactional activities."
"""This article addresses a significant question in American civil–military relations: under what conditions will civilian principals punish military leaders for shirking? In order to inductively derive a theory of civil–military... more
"""This article addresses a significant question in American civil–military relations: under what conditions will civilian principals punish military leaders for shirking? In order to inductively derive a theory of civil–military punishment, the authors examine two cases of military shirking where there is little doubt that insubordination occurred. The first case the authors analyze is Douglas MacArthur’s insubordination under Harry Truman during the Korean War, and the second is Colin Powell’s scuttling of Bill Clinton’s plan to allow homosexuals to serve openly in the military in late 1992 and early 1993. This analysis indicates that two factors are linked to civil–military punishment. First, the salience of the issue at stake determines whether he or she decides to punish shirking. The second factor linked to punishment is whether or not the civilian has the military’s support to pursue punishment.
"""
Add File

Log In

or
or reset password

Need an account? Click here to sign up

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

Academia © 2014