- Migration Studies, Social Policy, Minority Studies, Housing Policies, Diversity Management, Romani Studies, and 55 moreEducation, Housing, Urban Anthropology, Diversity & Inclusion, Gypsy Anthropology, Gypsy Studies, Sociology, Social and Cultural Anthropology, Educational Research, Gender, Political Science, Human Rights, Globalization, Politics, Education Policy, European Politics, Intercultural Education, European Union Politics, Affordable Housing, Eastern European Studies, Comparative Politics, Social Work, European integration, Social Sciences, Political Theory, Cultural and Social Anthropology, Anthropology of Education, Cultural anthropology. Ethnography of Education. Roma Culture and Education., Ethnography, Transnational migration, Transnationalism, Transnationalism and multiple identities, Race and Ethnicity, Ethnography (Research Methodology), European Immigration and Asylum Law, Social Inclusion, Ethnopolitics, Ethnic politics, Proyectos Y Politicas De Inclusion Social, Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, Community Engagement & Participation, Political Participation, Participación ciudadana, Anthropology of Mobility, Urban mobility, Political Mobilization, Urban Education, Social mobility and education. Social class. Ethnicity/'race' and minority studies. Roma/Gypsy/Travellers. Mixed methods research, Mobility/Mobilities, Intersectionality, Intersectionality and Social Inequality, Spanish Indignados (Occupy), Evictions, and Youth Studiesedit
- I am a social anthropologist affiliated to the UAB/EMIGRA research group. My research interests are in the field of m... moreI am a social anthropologist affiliated to the UAB/EMIGRA research group. My research interests are in the field of migration, mobilities, youth and minority studies. I use ethnography as the main approach to explore these topics, but i also have strong expertise in policy analysis and evaluation and a growing interest in collaborative and audio-visual research methods.
I graduated in International Studies in Torino, obtained a Master degree in International Migration and Intercultural Relations at the University of Osnabrück, and hold a PhD in Social and Cultural Anthropology at the Autonomous University of Barcelona in the framework of the INTEGRIM Marie Sklodowska-Curie Initial Training Network. Since 2015 I am executive editor at WOTS magazine.edit
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Education, Mobility/Mobilities, Educational Research, Urban Anthropology, Urban Education, and 6 moreRomanian Studies, Affordable Housing, Anthropology of Education, History of Race and Ethnicity, Urban mobility, and Social mobility and education. Social class. Ethnicity/'race' and minority studies. Roma/Gypsy/Travellers. Mixed methods research
Roma international mobility has strongly contributed to the Europeanization of the ‘Roma issue’. It was largely the political response of local and national governments to the arrival of ‘foreign (albeit European) Roma’ in their... more
Roma international mobility has strongly contributed to the Europeanization of the ‘Roma issue’. It was largely the political response of local and national governments to the arrival of ‘foreign (albeit European) Roma’ in their territories that convinced EU institutions to adopt a common framework for ‘Roma inclusion’. However, the formal recognition of ‘Roma people’ as a transnational minority, as well the adoption of 'Roma ethnicity' as an organizing principle for the redistributive policies pursued by the European Union, is anything but free of incoherencies. Such mobility reawakens and shifts the policy debate on the relation between socio-economic redistribution and identity recognition from a multi-national to a local context. This dilemma is mostly reflected in the question of weather, why, and how the welfare-based public action towards ‘ethnic migrants’ falls into the previous work with ‘ethnic nationals’, or, conversely, whether it has to do with policies addressing other immigrants. Is the social and economic disadvantage in which many Roma find themselves similar amongst ‘old’ and ‘new’ Roma communities in Western Europe, or not? What are the criteria for the comparisons we have to make, and should we deal with Roma migration on its own, or should we understand it in terms of wider structures? Furthermore, the coexistence of both ‘national’ and ‘immigrant’ Roma on a same territory, as well as under the same policy framework is challenging the making of a pan-European Roma identity. Besides the solidarity vs. competition characterization of the relation between these two groups, the main question here has to do with the repercussions that stereotyped and racialized perceptions of the former have on the development of policies for the latter. This ‘shift of stereotypes’ may charge ‘Roma migrants’ with the same collective inter-generational discrimination of their (at least officially) namesakes.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Según el informe de la Fundamental Rights Agency (2009) sobre la “Situación de los ciudadanos comunitarios de etnia romaní que residen en otros Estados miembros. Selección de iniciativas positivas”, el Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano a... more
Según el informe de la Fundamental Rights Agency (2009) sobre la “Situación de los ciudadanos comunitarios de etnia romaní que residen en otros Estados miembros. Selección de iniciativas positivas”, el Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano a Cataluña representa un modelo de buena práctica “en cuanto a la planificación estratégica de una administración regional para la integración de la población gitana … ya que considera expresamente a los ciudadanos comunitarios de etnía romaní procedentes de otros Estados miembros, lo que de por sí constituye una buena práctica sin precedentes”.
Un estudio específico realizado en el marco de la "Evaluación de los seis años del Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano a Cataluña" (Beremenyi & Mirga, 2012) claramente contradice las declaraciones y las expectativas de la Fundamental Rights Agency, tanto en relación a la la incorporación de los 'inmigrantes romaníes' desde un punto de vista transversal (como beneficiarios implícitos de todas las actuaciones del Plan), como desde la implementación de actuaciones específicas, explícitamente dirigidas a esta población.
En la práctica, la incorporación de los así llamados 'gitanos del Este' en el Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano en Cataluña presenta unos elementos, que ponen en duda tanto el impacto real de políticas específicas para gitanos/romá, como la viabilidad a nivel local del reconocimiento de los gitanos/roma como pueblo transnacional.
1. La interpretación de los gitanos como pueblo transnacional, y la atención que dedica el Plan Integral a los 'gitanos del Este', camufla el miedo ante la 'invasión de los romá' dentro de una política inclusiva de acción positiva .
2. El Plan Integral no propone nuevas actuaciones, ni genera nuevos recursos financieros, sino recoge en todas las políticas existentes en Catalunya explícitamente dirigidas a 'inmigrantes romaníes', y que ya se estaban realizando y financiando desde cada Departamento.
3. Los representantes de las asociaciones gitanas que participan en los órganos creados por el plan no reconocen los 'otros gitanos' como beneficiarios de 'su Plan'."
Un estudio específico realizado en el marco de la "Evaluación de los seis años del Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano a Cataluña" (Beremenyi & Mirga, 2012) claramente contradice las declaraciones y las expectativas de la Fundamental Rights Agency, tanto en relación a la la incorporación de los 'inmigrantes romaníes' desde un punto de vista transversal (como beneficiarios implícitos de todas las actuaciones del Plan), como desde la implementación de actuaciones específicas, explícitamente dirigidas a esta población.
En la práctica, la incorporación de los así llamados 'gitanos del Este' en el Plan Integral del Pueblo Gitano en Cataluña presenta unos elementos, que ponen en duda tanto el impacto real de políticas específicas para gitanos/romá, como la viabilidad a nivel local del reconocimiento de los gitanos/roma como pueblo transnacional.
1. La interpretación de los gitanos como pueblo transnacional, y la atención que dedica el Plan Integral a los 'gitanos del Este', camufla el miedo ante la 'invasión de los romá' dentro de una política inclusiva de acción positiva .
2. El Plan Integral no propone nuevas actuaciones, ni genera nuevos recursos financieros, sino recoge en todas las políticas existentes en Catalunya explícitamente dirigidas a 'inmigrantes romaníes', y que ya se estaban realizando y financiando desde cada Departamento.
3. Los representantes de las asociaciones gitanas que participan en los órganos creados por el plan no reconocen los 'otros gitanos' como beneficiarios de 'su Plan'."
Research Interests:
La presente contribución se centra en torno a las pautas de acceso a la vivienda entre familias rumanas romaníes en la ciudad de Granada, analizando cómo estas proceden de la interacción entre estrategias y necesidades propias de las... more
La presente contribución se centra en torno a las pautas de acceso a la vivienda entre familias rumanas romaníes en la ciudad de Granada, analizando cómo estas proceden de la interacción entre estrategias y necesidades propias de las redes de familias inmigrantes y las modalidades con las que las autoridades públicas gestionan recursos que, por lo menos idealmente, quieren garantizar el derecho a una vivienda digna.
Entre 2000 y 2008 las actuaciones municipales frente a la ocupación por parte de familias romaníes de viviendas y cortijos semis-abandonados fue esporádica y puntual. Sucesivamente los servicios sociales empezaron una política de re-alojamiento basada en la provisión de prestaciones sociales otorgadas para garantizar el acceso y la permanencia en pisos de las familias desahuciadas de las viviendas ocupadas. Sin embargo, tales medidas aseguraron solo en parte condiciones residenciales ‘dignas y adecuadas’ (según los propios criterios de planificación de los servicios sociales) mientras seguían alimentando o reproduciendo la movilidad residencial y las condiciones de hacinamiento. Éstas dependieron, además, de factores y dinámicas propias de la organización social de la inmigración romaní, relativos sobre todo a su perfil demográfico, a una estructura basada en amplias redes de parientes, a un heterogeneidad interna tanto de condiciones socioeconómicas como de objetivos migratorios.
Los datos que se presentan proceden de dos investigaciones independientes desarrolladas en la ciudad Granada entre 2003 y 2011, que han combinado observación participante, entrevistas a técnicos de los servicios públicos e informantes romaníes (Roma Korturare procedentes de Transilvania) y con la explotación de literatura gris.
Entre 2000 y 2008 las actuaciones municipales frente a la ocupación por parte de familias romaníes de viviendas y cortijos semis-abandonados fue esporádica y puntual. Sucesivamente los servicios sociales empezaron una política de re-alojamiento basada en la provisión de prestaciones sociales otorgadas para garantizar el acceso y la permanencia en pisos de las familias desahuciadas de las viviendas ocupadas. Sin embargo, tales medidas aseguraron solo en parte condiciones residenciales ‘dignas y adecuadas’ (según los propios criterios de planificación de los servicios sociales) mientras seguían alimentando o reproduciendo la movilidad residencial y las condiciones de hacinamiento. Éstas dependieron, además, de factores y dinámicas propias de la organización social de la inmigración romaní, relativos sobre todo a su perfil demográfico, a una estructura basada en amplias redes de parientes, a un heterogeneidad interna tanto de condiciones socioeconómicas como de objetivos migratorios.
Los datos que se presentan proceden de dos investigaciones independientes desarrolladas en la ciudad Granada entre 2003 y 2011, que han combinado observación participante, entrevistas a técnicos de los servicios públicos e informantes romaníes (Roma Korturare procedentes de Transilvania) y con la explotación de literatura gris.
Research Interests:
This report offers a synthetic description of the political-ideological contexts vis-à-vis Roma migration in both countries of origin (Bulgaria and Romania) and destination (Italy, Spain and Austria), as well as a critical analysis of the... more
This report offers a synthetic description of the political-ideological contexts vis-à-vis Roma migration in both countries of origin (Bulgaria and Romania) and destination (Italy, Spain and Austria), as well as a critical analysis of the policies targeted to this population in the countries of the consortium.
Each national chapter is divided in almost two sections. The first one aims at introducing the reader to the issue of Roma migration, also offering data and references to the most important national literature on this topic. The second section focusses on the National Roma Integration Strategies and, when applicable, also on the diverse incorporation of Roma migrants in these legislative frameworks.
In the chapter on Romania, the description of the political and ideological context is accompanied by an analysis of the representation of the Roma in the Romanian media, which seem to shape the relationship with the European Union. The Spanish chapter includes some results of an inedited study on the ‘Roma migrants’ in the Comprehensive Plan for Roma People in Catalonia, realized in collaboration with the EMIGRA Research Group, one of the REdHNET associate partners.
Each national chapter is divided in almost two sections. The first one aims at introducing the reader to the issue of Roma migration, also offering data and references to the most important national literature on this topic. The second section focusses on the National Roma Integration Strategies and, when applicable, also on the diverse incorporation of Roma migrants in these legislative frameworks.
In the chapter on Romania, the description of the political and ideological context is accompanied by an analysis of the representation of the Roma in the Romanian media, which seem to shape the relationship with the European Union. The Spanish chapter includes some results of an inedited study on the ‘Roma migrants’ in the Comprehensive Plan for Roma People in Catalonia, realized in collaboration with the EMIGRA Research Group, one of the REdHNET associate partners.
This report represents the first product of the REdHNET project // Romani People, Educational and Housing Policies: Key Links to Share. It provides a bibliographic review (to be gradually improved through the duration of the project)... more
This report represents the first product of the REdHNET project // Romani People, Educational and Housing Policies: Key Links to Share.
It provides a bibliographic review (to be gradually improved through the duration of the project) of the theoretical and policy framework surrounding the issues tackled by the REdHNET project. The report approaches in a very schematic and simplified way, discourses, findings, and policies, which are relevant for the design of housing and educational interventions aimed to Roma migrants. For this reason, it may represent an useful reference tool for policy makers and for people working in the field of education and housing. The report is also an essential toolkit for the design of the next REdHNET research tools, as well for the joint reflection and debates to be held during the next transnational meetings.
A first section is introductory to the topics tackled by the REdHNET project. The description of Roma migration in Europe (chapter 1) is followed by a review of the educational and housing situations of Roma migrants from Romania and Bulgaria in both countries of origin and destination (chapter 2). Then, the backbone of the project is approached trough a bibliographic review of the existent literature focusing on the link between education, housing conditions and mobility (chapter 3). Finally, the report offers some insights into the researches approaching the mutual relations between school systems and Roma or immigrant students (chapter 4).
The second part of this report is rooted on the objective of the REdHNET project to define the criteria or elements characterizing the most successful policies and practices of coordination in the field of housing and education. In the first place, the concept of ‘good practice’ – with which we will deal during the whole duration of the project – will be critically presented (chapter 5). Then, the ‘should-be’ best policies and best practices criteria in the three domains addressed by the project (romani policies, education, and housing) will be presented according to the definition given by international and European policy-makers, and human rights monitoring mechanisms (chapters 6 to 8).
It provides a bibliographic review (to be gradually improved through the duration of the project) of the theoretical and policy framework surrounding the issues tackled by the REdHNET project. The report approaches in a very schematic and simplified way, discourses, findings, and policies, which are relevant for the design of housing and educational interventions aimed to Roma migrants. For this reason, it may represent an useful reference tool for policy makers and for people working in the field of education and housing. The report is also an essential toolkit for the design of the next REdHNET research tools, as well for the joint reflection and debates to be held during the next transnational meetings.
A first section is introductory to the topics tackled by the REdHNET project. The description of Roma migration in Europe (chapter 1) is followed by a review of the educational and housing situations of Roma migrants from Romania and Bulgaria in both countries of origin and destination (chapter 2). Then, the backbone of the project is approached trough a bibliographic review of the existent literature focusing on the link between education, housing conditions and mobility (chapter 3). Finally, the report offers some insights into the researches approaching the mutual relations between school systems and Roma or immigrant students (chapter 4).
The second part of this report is rooted on the objective of the REdHNET project to define the criteria or elements characterizing the most successful policies and practices of coordination in the field of housing and education. In the first place, the concept of ‘good practice’ – with which we will deal during the whole duration of the project – will be critically presented (chapter 5). Then, the ‘should-be’ best policies and best practices criteria in the three domains addressed by the project (romani policies, education, and housing) will be presented according to the definition given by international and European policy-makers, and human rights monitoring mechanisms (chapters 6 to 8).
Research Interests: Intercultural Education, Education Policy, European Politics, Romani Studies, Migration Studies, and 3 moreAffordable Housing, European Union Politics, and Critical pedagogy and critical theory Qualitative research Ethnography, autoethnography Service-learning in teacher education and multicultural education Transnational issues affecting education for immigrant children
Coordinators / Authors: Dr. Bálint-Ábel Bereményi (UAB) and Anna Mirga (FAGIC). Report elaborated by the Federation of Roma Associations in Catalonia (FAGIC) and the EMIGRA Group (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona).
The study intends to offer an evaluation of the implementation of the social housing and social services schemes in the case of the Romanian Roma community settled in the suburbs of Granada. Both the family housing strategies (like... more
The study intends to offer an evaluation of the implementation of the social housing and social services schemes in the case of the Romanian Roma community settled in the suburbs of Granada. Both the family housing strategies (like residential mobility and overcrowding) and the public initiatives aimed at ensuring the access to a decent and adequate housing (based essentially on unsustainable social services' benefits-based housing practices) are analysed. Methodologically, the study is based on a qualitative field investigation and is supported by an exhaustive legislative and newspaper-based bibliographic research. It pretends to be a useful instrument for the comparison, at a EU and local level, of diverse policy approaches to housing with respect to the Eastern EU Roma communities settled in Western EU countries.


