Unless there is a global moratorium on AI progress, this set of predictions seems extremely wrong. You think that we'll achieve RSI and all we'll get on the other side is 1.5% added to GDP?
It must be scary to be an undergrad (or even younger) and not know whether you will ever have a career.
I am not so sure in the second paragraph in Cas' tweet. My best guess is that many young people will never have a career.
It seems like a hard time to be an undergrad concerned with making AI go better. I have talked with a lot of undergrads at several university AI safety clubs in the past month. Consistently across universities, there is a general shared sense of undergraduate dread about next-gen
The "extreme" scenarios here are not nearly extreme enough because they only assume knowledge work will get automated. Physical labor could get automated by 2030 as well. The size of the economy could be 10x what it is today.
Anthropic’s Economics team is sharing a new model of how AI might affect economic growth, jobs, wages, and more by 2030.
Explore the scenarios, tell us what you think will happen, and see how your answers compare to more than 10,000 Americans. anthropic.com/institute/econ…
Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.
The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible - but I hear the same people express fear
Some people say "Pausing AI development now would be counterproductive because it will make it harder to pause when it really matters." I disagree.
I think pausing/pacing the frontier is less of "an action that you can only do once and thus have to conserve until dangerously